Get healthy, or else!


I read this rather disturbing article in the Associated Press today, in which it is reported that “Manchester is hoping to fight fat with a reward system that works like a retail loyalty card. But instead of earning credit for opening their wallets, residents will be rewarded for keeping their feet on the treadmill and their fridge stocked with healthy food.”

Now, on the surface, this might seem like a good idea. Heck, I could stand to lose a few myself, and who wouldn’t want to be rewarded simply for doing the right thing? But if you look a little under the surface, this becomes troubling.

First and foremost, I have a problem with the government sticking their nose into my personal life, no matter how benevolent the motive may seem. It’s a short but steep slope from “We’ll reward you for being healthy” to “Get healthy, or else!” Right now, they’re offering the carrot, but who’s to say that once we accept this latest incarnation of Nanny government that the carrot won’t be replaced with a big and expensive stick. For example, what’s to stop the government from offering two tax tables, one for people who meet its definition of “healthy”, and those who don’t. As an overweight man who loves to smoke, I know which table I’d be paying under.

“Ah Ha!”, you say. “Smith, you big fat smoker you, you’re a drain on the health care system! Look at me: I’m a non-smoking vegetarian who runs five miles a day! You and those like you should be like me!”

To which I say: that’s the price you pay to live in a FREE COUNTRY. (Remember that phrase?) You have to put up with my bad habits and I have to put up with yours. Chances are, you are not entirely vice free yourself. And even if you are, I have news for you: unless you get hit by a bus, you too will grow old and become a drain on the health care system. It happens to almost all of us. Your wonderful “healthy lifestyle” won’t save you in the end.

Those who believe in the Nanny government and who wish to control us realize that they cannot do so without uniting people against a common enemy. For Hitler, it was the Jews. For McCarthy it was the Communists. For Nanny government advocates, it is: Bad Health. These people feel they can enact all manner of government intrusion into people’s lives, as long as it is being done in the name of Good Health. Good Health has become our new Golden Idol.

And for some of you who were nonplussed at my recent post about the 2008 election, know this: this is exactly why I have never voted Democrat. It is why I remain profoundly concerned about the Obama presidency. This sort of thing is far, far more likely to occur in the United States under a Democratic government.

Says Timothy Armstrong, coordinator of the World Health Organization’s global strategy on diet, and quoted in the same article, “I haven’t seen any evidence that it works, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try it…as public health officials we really don’t have the luxury of waiting to see what works and what doesn’t. We really do know that, in terms of curbing the obesity epidemic, all of society needs to play a role”.

It takes a village, right Timothy? And naturally, this is being funded by (who else?) the taxpayers.

Just so no one gets the wrong idea here, let me state flat out that I realize that this program is benign and well meant. And yes, I realize it’s happening in England, but our two countries are so closely linked culturally that it’s no stretch to imagine it happening here. Just look at what the Boston Public Health Commission is trying to get away with. People are getting fatter (probably because they’ve stopped smoking). But I become deeply troubled when the government starts using its leverage to try to force me to live a certain way, because I realize how quickly and easily the can change from benevolent cajoling to a direct order. I believe that, deep down, the Nancy Pelosi’s of the world don’t really want to be agreed with, they want to be obeyed. Once people allow themselves to buy into the idea that Nanny government is taking care of them, anything is possible. “Get healthy, or else!”.

Now where did I put those Cheesey Puffs?


“taking up a glowing cinder with the tongs and lighting with it the long cherry-wood pipe which was wont to replace his clay when he was in a disputatious rather than a meditative mood”–Dr. John H. Watson

Please visit my blog at

6 Responses

  1. “Ah Ha!”, you say. “Smith, you big fat smoker you, you’re a drain on the health care system! Look at me: I’m a non-smoking vegetarian who runs five miles a day! You and those like you should be like me!”

    As a non-smoking vegetarian who used to run between five and twelve miles a day, before she wrecked her ankle, I say: smoke and eat all you want!

    See, thing is, there are no shortage of people telling ME that I’m not healthy enough. “Some meat is good for you.” “You’re not getting enough protein.” (Pray tell, how I could not be getting enough protein and manage to run as much as I did?) “It’s healthier to eat some fish.” “You eat a lot of chocolate.” Ya know what? I don’t want more protein, some fish, or some meat. I just don’t. Not happening.

    If someone comes along and decides that my diet is inadequate, I don’t want them lobbying the government to tax me more if I keep eating what I eat. I’m going to keep on my useless carbs, my chocolate, my five meals a day, my exercise habits (as much as possible), because it’s a free country and it makes me happy.

    Non-smoking, exercise-maniacal, vegetarians also want the government to butt out.

  2. I agree with you that you should be able to eat and do whatever you want. This is a free country (thanks to all the wonderful veterans) and we are permitted to consume whatever edibles we desrire to, healthy or not. But that is where our ideals start to differ.

    Living in a free country does NOT mean that we have to put up with each other’s bad habits. That’s why I bought a house – so I could get AWAY from people that annoy me. When I go to a restaurant, I want to eat food and not inhale someone else’s smoke. It’s not a health thing, it’s an I don’t want to smell your burning tobacco thing.

    Now, Murder, I have read some of your other posts and I will immediately say that it is bullshit that they are trying to close cigar bars in Massachusetts. All I meant by my last statement is that the reason for a restaurant is to eat food, not smoke. The reason for a cigar bar is to smoke and not to eat. Agreed?

    Back to the original point – I DO believe that a slight “fat tax” would be good for our country. There have been countless studies linking obesity with an increase in health costs. Your tax table idea could work but rather than on two different kinds of “people” (I mean, how can you be sure that anyone is ALWAYS healthy) have it on two different kinds of food. Healthy food is taxed as normal and the fatty stuff would have an additional tax. This additional money would not go to the government but rather directly to the health care industry to offset additional costs associated with obese people. This would keep the health care costs down for EVERYONE and then people who want to eat whatever they want won’t be draining the system.

  3. Actually, Gerald, statistically it is far healthier to be above normal weight (whatever that is) than below it.

  4. Again, who is going to determine what is healthy food? There are people who depend on the ketogenic diet (very high fat, low carb diet) to keep their seizures under control. There are people that depend on low carb diets for their diabetes. There are people (such as myself) with low blood pressure that need to eat salty foods to keep the blood pressure up so I don’t pass out when I stand up suddenly.

    And I certainly don’t want to put somebody in charge of charging ME money because THEY have particular food fads that they and the insurance companies are pushing for profit. Most of what is “common knowledge” about “healthy foods” is false as demonstrated under long-term follow up.

  5. “Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit.”
    W. Somerset Maugham

  6. Wow.

    Doesn’t the government have other things to be concerned about? You know… Like running the country?

Comments are closed.


Sercan Ondem

The Light

Inspire, Encourage and Empower

All about career, personal development, productivity & leadership


Sercan Ondem

The Reset Blog

Start over, just don't stop


A topnotch site

My life as Atu's Blog

a small thougt for a big planet of daydreamer

Taffy Toffy's Blog


About life, the universe and everything

Drowning in depression.

Is'nt it great being a human!

%d bloggers like this: