Our Opinion
Nashua Telegraph 11/25/1975
Mr. Reagan’s Record
Ronald Reagan, or so the ultraconservative legend runs, brought the yeasty state of California to the brink of perfection during his two terms as governor.
Since his tenure as governor constitutes his first and only governmental service and experience, Mr. Reagan and his flacks make much of it; too much, in fact.
When he announced his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination last week, Mr. Reagan performed the obligatory “mess in Washington” routine and promised to clean it up tidily, using the techniques he employed as governor of California to “manage government more efficiently.” “We found that fiscal responsibility is possible, that the welfare rolls can come down, that social problems can be met below the federal level.” So much for the rhetoric. Now for the record:
While Ronald Reagan was governor of California the state budget soared from $4.6 billion to $10.2 billion — a more than 100 per cent increase.
While Ronald Reagan was governor of California the state sales tax was increased from 4 per cent to 6 per cent, the corporate income tax was increased from 5.5 per cent to 9 per cent, and the top personal income tax was increased from 7 per cent to 11 per cent.
While Ronald Reagan was governor of California the number of state employees increased by 5.7 per cent. This is the mart who promises to cut armies of employees off the federal payroll, who promises to balance the budget, who promises to begin paying off the national debt and who, to top his program of conservative delights, promises to cut taxes to boot.
Some people may be charmed by Ronald Reagan’s pitch; some people may even be persuaded, but the difference between promises and performance, between the Reagan rhetoric and the Reagan record is a difference that should be made plain to the voters of New Hampshire and the rest of the nation.
Several of my friends on the right have questioned the conservative bona fides of Mike Huckabee. I thought this editorial from Reagan’s first run for the nomination against incumbent Gerald Ford was interesting. The Republican establishment was clearly against Reagan, and his run for the 76 nomination was unsuccessful.
Mike Huckabee is no Ronald Reagan. But, a fair comparison of the of the governance by both the Reagan administration in California, and the Huckabee administration in Arkansas shows some striking fiscal simlarities.
If Mike Hukcabee wants to win this election, he needs to serious up on National Security issues, speak clearly on foreign policy matters, and outline his vision for carrying forward the war on terror.
Fiscal conservatism is important. Social conservatism is important. But neither of them mean much at all without national security.
Filed under: conservatism, Election 2008, News and politics | Tagged: 'War on Terrorism', conservatism, Election 2008, News and politics | 29 Comments »